Hoshin Kanri, Balanced Scorecard, OKR – Understanding the Differences
Effective strategy deployment is essential for any organization—without it, a strategy is simply a plan without action. However, coordinating strategy implementation is no easy task, especially in larger companies where leaders are constantly balancing numerous responsibilities and urgent tasks, making it difficult to maintain focus on long-term goals.
One question that often arises is: “Are we using the right method for strategy deployment?” With several methods available, each designed to help organizations execute their strategic plans, the challenge is determining which approach best fits your company’s structure, maturity, and industry. While all methods follow a top-down approach, they vary in how strategy is cascaded and aligned across the organization.
In this blog, we’ll explore three popular strategy deployment methods—Objectives and Key Results (OKR), Hoshin Kanri (HK), and the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). We’ll compare how each supports strategy execution and highlight their key differences. OKR, HK, and BSC aren’t rigid formulas but adaptable frameworks, each offering a unique way to drive strategy forward.
Hoshin Kanri, OKR & BSC at a Glance
The table below summarizes the three methods and highlights their key differences.

Objectives and Key Results (OKR)
OKR is a goal-setting framework made famous by companies like Google and Amazon. In OKR, organizations define qualitative objectives paired with 3–5 key results—quantitative indicators that track progress. Each objective is aligned with specific initiatives or actions aimed at achieving the key results.
Company-level OKRs are typically set annually, while team and individual OKRs are reviewed quarterly. This structure allows organizations to pursue strategic initiatives through agile, short-term objectives. While the OKR framework focuses on high-level outcomes, it also embraces the reality that not every goal will be fully achieved. OKRs are designed to be ambitious and flexible, fostering a culture of experimentation and continuous improvement.
Pros:
- Agility and Flexibility: OKRs allow organizations to quickly adapt to changing priorities and market conditions due to their quarterly review cycle. This makes it ideal for fast-paced environments that require constant iteration and adjustment.
- Focus on Outcomes: Rather than focusing on the specifics of how goals are achieved, OKRs emphasize measurable results, which can lead to innovation and creative problem-solving.
- Scalability: OKRs cascade from company-wide objectives to team and individual goals, ensuring alignment across all levels of the organization while maintaining flexibility for departments or teams to set their own specific initiatives.
Cons:
- Limited Long-Term Focus: Since OKRs are typically set and reviewed quarterly, organizations may struggle to maintain long-term vision and coherence in their strategy. This short-term focus can sometimes result in a lack of consistency in pursuing broader, multi-year goals.
- Potential Overemphasis on Key Results: The drive to meet key results might overshadow the importance of other elements, such as improving processes or fostering company culture, which may be harder to measure but are still critical for long-term success.
Best Suited For: OKRs are great for startups and fast-paced businesses operating on short strategic cycles and with low need for internal alignment. They work particularly well for organizations that value agility, rapid execution, and the ability to pivot quickly. OKRs are ideal for environments where innovation, speed, and measurable outcomes are more critical than long-term structural alignment.
Hoshin Kanri (HK)
While less known in Europe, Hoshin Kanri (HK) is used by industry giants like Tesla, Toyota, HP, and Bank of America. Rooted in lean philosophy, HK aligns strategic objectives with organizational functions and activities over a longer time frame. It incorporates both long-term objectives (3–5 years) and annual plans, each with specific goals, improvement actions, and clear responsibilities. This approach ensures that every level of the organization is actively working toward the overarching strategy while maintaining focus on continuous improvement.
A key feature of HK is its involvement of lower organizational levels in setting objectives and planning improvement projects. Managers and teams assess top-level objectives and propose actions suited to their areas, ensuring that the strategy resonates at all levels of the organization. This collaborative process fosters a culture of ownership, commitment, and accountability, as employees at all levels feel personally invested in the success of the organization. The result is a unified direction and a shared responsibility for achieving long-term strategic goals.
Pros:
- Deep Alignment Across All Levels: Hoshin Kanri encourages extensive involvement from all levels of the organization, ensuring that strategic objectives are translated into actionable plans that align with operational activities. This promotes buy-in and engagement from every part of the business.
- Long-Term Focus: By setting both 3-5 year objectives and annual plans, HK is designed for companies seeking sustainable growth and a structured, long-term approach to strategy deployment.
- Clear Accountability and Ownership: With specific goals and improvement actions assigned at every level, individuals and teams understand their roles in achieving strategic objectives, creating a sense of responsibility and motivation to succeed.
Cons:
- Time-Intensive Implementation: The process of aligning objectives, creating detailed action plans, and gaining consensus across the organization can be time-consuming and requires a significant upfront investment of resources.
- Requires High-Level Commitment: For HK to be effective, leadership must consistently review progress, provide guidance, and adapt the strategy as needed. This ongoing commitment from top management is essential to ensuring the method remains relevant and successful over time.
Best Suited For: Hoshin Kanri is a perfect fit best suited for mid- to large-sized organizations with long-term growth ambitions and business cycles that support longer strategic horizons. It is particularly powerful for companies operating across multiple locations or business units, where deep alignment and cross-functional collaboration are essential. HK is ideal for industries that emphasize continuous improvement, operational excellence, and strategic clarity across all levels of the organization. For businesses seeking to build a culture of engagement, accountability, and sustainable progress, Hoshin Kanri offers a comprehensive and future-ready framework.
Balanced Scorecard (BSC)
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a widely recognized method that integrates both financial and non-financial objectives across four key areas: finance, customers, internal processes, and learning & growth. By providing a holistic view of performance, the BSC enables organizations to track both short-term financial success and long-term strategic goals. It connects strategy with KPIs, specific targets, and projects designed to drive performance, ensuring that every aspect of the business is aligned with its overarching vision.
The BSC encourages business units to align financial objectives with broader corporate strategy, ensuring that financial goals guide and support the organization’s long-term direction. It goes beyond financial metrics by incorporating customer satisfaction, internal operational improvements, and organizational learning, providing a well-rounded view of performance. This comprehensive approach helps companies not only achieve short-term profitability but also build long-term capabilities and customer loyalty. By linking each objective to measurable outcomes, the BSC offers clarity on how every part of the organization contributes to long-term success.
Pros:
- Holistic View of Performance: The BSC looks at a company from multiple perspectives—financial, customer, internal processes, and learning & growth—ensuring a well-rounded approach to strategy and performance.
- Alignment with Long-Term Strategy: BSC aligns both financial and non-financial objectives with the company’s broader strategic goals, ensuring that every aspect of the business is pulling in the same direction.
- Clear Link to Strategy: Every objective is tied to specific KPIs and measurable outcomes, making it easy to track progress and ensure accountability across all levels of the organization.
Cons:
- Complex Implementation: Developing the right set of KPIs for each of the four perspectives can be challenging, requiring careful consideration to ensure alignment with the company’s strategic goals. This complexity can make initial implementation time-consuming and resource-intensive.
- Overemphasis on Metrics: While the BSC is comprehensive, the focus on metrics can sometimes overshadow qualitative factors such as employee morale or creativity, which are also crucial to long-term success but are harder to quantify.
Best Suited For: The Balanced Scorecard is a solid choice for established organizations with simple and well-defined structures and no need to drive significant transformational changes. It works particularly well in environments where consistent performance across multiple dimensions—financial, customer, operational, and developmental—is a top priority. BSC is ideal for companies aiming to improve alignment and execution within an existing strategic framework, rather than reinventing their approach entirely.
Embedding Strategy Execution
It’s crucial to recognize that these methods must be deeply embedded in the company culture and continuously nurtured through ongoing management processes. Once fully integrated, effective strategy execution not only accelerates growth but also fosters alignment and accountability throughout the organization.
To successfully implement Hoshin Kanri, using software can streamline the process by automating tracking, improving transparency, and enhancing collaboration across teams. With the right tools, you can ensure that strategic objectives are consistently aligned and progress is measurable in real-time. Learn how our software can simplify Hoshin Kanri implementation and help drive your strategy forward.